Female sex as a biological variable: A review on younger patients with acute coronary syndrome,✰✰

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2018.06.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Although acute coronary syndrome (ACS) mainly occurs in individuals >60 years, younger adults can be affected as well. Women continue to be at higher risk of 30-day mortality after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) even in the current era of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Importantly, the excess mortality among women is only significant at younger ages. Previous work has suggested that the reason for the differences in outcome is likely multifactorial and may partially be explained by some of the following factors: atypical presentation, delayed presentation, under-recognition of STEMI at initial medical contact, and underuse of medications because of concern regarding increased risk of bleeding. While these hypotheses may be true in some occasions, recent studies pointed out that the proportion of women presenting within 2 h after symptom onset was greater in the younger than in older cohorts. In addition, sex differences in administration of adjunctive medical therapies were greater in the older than in the younger cohort. Thus, there is not any one of the abovementioned factors able to explain the increase in mortality in the young women. Disparities alone could not account for the gap in mortality across sexes. Unless the effects of sex are studied, we will continue to have gaps in the knowledge of potential different mechanisms leading young women and men to die after ACS, which may result in missed opportunities for implementing a better health in our community. Randomizing or balancing the sexes as well as powering studies to detect sex differences is warranted in future research.

Introduction

Although acute coronary syndrome (ACS) mainly occurs in individuals >60 years, younger adults can be affected as well. A recent study [1] has shown that women continue to be at higher risk of 30-day mortality after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) even in the current era of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data on 8,834 patients with STEMI in 41 hospitals in Europe were obtained from the International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes (ISACS-TC) registry between 2010 and 2016. Participants consisted of 2,657 women (mean age, 66.1 years) and 6,177 men (mean age, 59.9 years). The analysis indicated that women had a significantly higher 30-day mortality risk than men (11.6% versus 6%). After limiting the evaluation to participants undergoing primary PCI, the disparity in sex-specific mortality shrunk to 7.1% for women and 3.3% for men. Early mortality risk was higher among women younger than 60 years than among men in the same age cohort when adjusting for medications and other comorbidities (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.04–3.26). Sex differences in 30-day mortality risk were not significant among participants aged 60 to 70 years (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.88–1.88) and those older than 75 years (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.8–1.73). The extent to which mortality rate differences between young men and women are related to disparities in treatment or dissimilarities in pathophysiology remains a matter of debate. Nevertheless, this study is the first investigation that demonstrates that differences between younger men and younger women in STEMI mortality rates are unrelated even to disparities in treatment. Sex-related pathophysiological differences may contribute to the higher mortality in younger women compared with men of the same age category. This review article strongly supports the view that female sex is a biological variable and contributes to implement the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines that were developed to assist researchers in reporting sex and gender information in publications [2]

Section snippets

Sex matters

“If the present arrangements of society will not admit of woman's free development, then society must be remodeled, and adapted to the great wants of humanity” (Elizabeth Blackwell)

The idea that there are sex-based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction is not new. One study investigated mortality trend sex differences from 1994 to 1998. Data were collected from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) on 691,995 patients [3]. The overall mortality rate during

Contradiction in the literature

“Truth comes out of error more readily than out of confusion” (Francis Bacon)

Some scientists argued that the major flaw encountered in the above-mentioned research studies was the failure to calculate outcomes with separate analyses for patients with and without STEMI. Further, some of the early studies on sex difference in outcome predate the era of routine invasive approach and other current standard-of-care medications. One study found a sex-ACS subtype interaction in a large sample of

Can we resolve the contradiction?

“Contradiction is the lever of transcendence” (Simone Weil)

We did resolve the contradiction at least partially. A key to understanding is first the recognition that STEMI is a unique clinical entity with epidemiology, incidence, and outcomes distinct from that of NSTEMI. STEMI and NSTEMI differ considerably in the management options. Treatment of patients with NSTEMI is more complex and challenging than treatment of patients with STEMI. In STEMI time to reperfusion is a basic factor influencing

Proposed working definition of a younger person

“The first part of life is childhood. The second is your child's childhood. And then the third, old age.” (Barbara Kingsolver)

The results of subgroup analyses by age can result in either consistent or insignificant findings depending on the definition of age used in the study [9]. No subgroup analysis will attain practical usefulness when undertaken without any explanatory background, no matter how significant the results may be [10]. Thus, when does younger age begin in research studies? Our

Cardiovascular disease in the young: a specific role for diabetes in women?

“The important thing is to not stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing” (Albert Einstein)

According to the United Nations “Population Aging Report” (2009), the proportion of the global population aged less than 60 years was 92% in 1950, 90% in 2000, and is expected to reach 89% in 2050. Patients less than 60 years old represented 43.1% of all patients who presented with STEMI to hospitals enrolled in the ISACS-TC registry over a 6-year period [1]. Thus, there is a substantial

The interplay between diabetes and ischemic artery disease

“The very process of living is a continual interplay between the individual and his environment, often taking the form of a struggle resulting in injury or disease” (Rene Dubos)

The ISACS-TC registry showed that in younger people the presence of diabetes conferred a similar risk of death from any cause, as did a history of prior PCI [1]. The same was not true for women and men older than 60 years, in whom the risk of death was lower for people with diabetes than for those with a history of prior

Angiographic CAD burden and mortality in the young

“The tragedy associated with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease is that it kills or disables people during their prime of life.” (Paul Dudley White)

Atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries is known to have an impact on the development and severity of ACS [27]. Given that young patients with ACS presented an average of two decades earlier than old patients and with fewer risk factors, it is conceivable that researchers observed less multivessel disease, less calcification, and fewer ostial

Sex disparities in treatment

“Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good” (Charlotte Whitton)

Prior studies have suggested that women with ACS are treated less aggressively than men. In the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) initiative, women were less likely to receive heparin and antiplatelet agents and less likely to undergo

Estimating sex differences in treatment effects using observational data

“If it were not for the great variability between individuals, medicine might as well be a science, not an art” (William Osler)

Many studies have estimated an “average treatment effect” that implicitly assumes a similar treatment effect across sexes. In contrast, therapeutic strategies for ACS may have a different effect in women compared with men. A contemporary example of this is given by the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for which randomized clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy

Sex differences in pathophysiology

“Belief begins where science leaves off and ends where science begins.” (Rudolf Ludwig Karl Virchow)

There could be several reasons for why younger women are more likely to die than young men. Diabetes in women may have a more powerful role than in men [38]. One study found that diabetes was a factor associated with increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality in the young, but not the old population, and was accompanied by a large sex gap in mortality [1]. Elevated triglycerides have been shown

Trends in sex-related outcomes

“The problem seemed to me not that there are differences but rather how we value these differences” (Sue Monk Kidd)

Bhatt and colleagues examined Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 2004 to 2011 to assess temporal trends and sex differences in revascularization and in-hospital outcomes for younger patients with acute myocardial infarction [51]. The cohort consisted of 1,363,492 adults aged between 18 and 59 years. Of these, 632,930 patients (46.4%) had STEMI. Women were less likely than

What do you do next?

“The laws of science do not distinguish between the past and the future.” (Stephen Hawking)

The United States (US) National Institutes of Health (NIH) now requires that scientists incorporate Sex as a Biological Variable (SABV) in its funded vertebrate animal research by considering whether the system under study operates differently in the two sexes through the comparison of males and females in at least some key experiments. The NIH's view pertains also to clinical trials and observational

Conclusions

“We want to end gender inequality and to do that we need everyone to be involved” (Emma Watson)

Consideration of sex may be critical to the interpretation, validation, and generalizability of research findings. Including sex/ gender analysis in research could save more women from ischemic heart disease

References (53)

  • MT Roe et al.

    Documented traditional cardiovascular risk factors and mortality in non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

    Am Heart J

    (2007)
  • JE Davia et al.

    Coronary artery disease in young patients: arteriographic and clinical review of 40 cases aged 35 and under

    Am Heart J

    (1974)
  • R Bugiardini et al.

    A short history of vasospastic angina

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2017)
  • AL Blomkalns et al.

    Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: large-scale observations from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) National Quality Improvement Initiative

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2005)
  • DJ Lerner et al.

    Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population

    Am Heart J

    (1986)
  • Q Chen et al.

    APOE polymorphism and angiographic coronary artery disease severity in the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study

    Atherosclerosis

    (2003)
  • LJ Shaw et al.

    Women and ischemic heart disease: evolving knowledge

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2009)
  • S Khera et al.

    Temporal trends and sex differences in revascularization and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in younger adults in the United States

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2015)
  • A Sabbag et al.

    Recent temporal trends in the presentation, management, and outcome of women hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes

    Am J Med

    (2015)
  • E Cenko et al.

    Sex differences in outcomes after STEMI: effect modification by treatment strategy and age

    JAMA Intern Med

    (2018)
  • S Heidari et al.

    Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use

    Res Integr Peer Rev

    (2016)
  • V Vaccarino et al.

    National registry of myocardial infarction 2 participants. Sex‐based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction

    N Engl J Med.

    (1999)
  • JG Canto et al.

    Association of age and sex with myocardial infarction symptom presentation and in-hospital mortality

    JAMA

    (2012)
  • JS Berger et al.

    Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes

    JAMA

    (2009)
  • KP Champney et al.

    The joint contribution of sex, age and type of myocardial infarction on hospital mortality following acute myocardial infarction

    Heart

    (2009)
  • S Yusuf et al.

    Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Heterogenicity of diabetes as a risk factor for all-cause mortality after acute myocardial infarction: Age and sex impact

      2021, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      We have revealed that the association between T2DM and mortality was substantially more robust in young females. Such interaction was reported in previous studies [4,7,37,38]. However, other studies of young females with ACS with a short-term follow-up have not supported this phenomenon [39,40].

    • Meta-Analysis of Gender Disparities in In-hospital Care and Outcomes in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

      2021, American Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the fact that age is the primary driver of the gender disparity in post-STEMI mortality should not lead to complacency because this is a multifactorial problem and there are many modifiable risk factors that also contribute to the observed gender differences. Recent studies showed that the gender gap persists after adjustment, particularly in younger females (< 60 years);13-15 but, given the lack of patient-level-data, we were not able to include this subgroup in our study and thus requires further investigation. Moreover, although the multiple regressions for other outcomes were limited by sample size, it appears that female gender is not a significant predictor of repeat MI or stroke after adjustment.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest: None.

    ✰✰

    Funding: None.

    View full text